If you can get to its essence, even a lowly potato would be poetic.
—Jayanta Mahapatra, “Of the Lowly Potato: Indian English Poetry Today” (2001)
Showing posts with label thing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label thing. Show all posts
feeling things
Poetry presents the thing in order to convey the feeling. It should be precise about the thing and reticent about the feeling.
—Wei T’ai, (A poet of Sung Dynasty cited in A.C. Graham’s Poems of the Late T’ang), quoted by Charles Reznikoff.
—Wei T’ai, (A poet of Sung Dynasty cited in A.C. Graham’s Poems of the Late T’ang), quoted by Charles Reznikoff.
Labels:
Charles Reznikoff,
Chinese poetry,
feeling,
image,
objectivists,
precise,
thing,
Wei T'ai
immediate contact
Intuition can only operate by an immediate contact with the thing. In poetry what in logic are called subjective and objective are united. There is no observer and thing observed, both are one; the poet is the bird, the flower, the tree, the Pope (Browning in “The Ring and the Book”), the ship (Coleridge in “The Ancient Mariner”), and anything else to which he is able to join himself. And if this union does not take place there can be no poetry.
—Michael Oakeshott, “Philosophy, Poetry and Reality,” What is History? (Imprint Academic, 2004)
—Michael Oakeshott, “Philosophy, Poetry and Reality,” What is History? (Imprint Academic, 2004)
Labels:
immediacy,
intuition,
Michael Oakeshott,
objective,
observer,
philosophy,
subjective,
thing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
