Like his thoughts Stevens' poems exist in the present moment; one has a sense while reading him that creation is proceeding before one’s eyes. The whole is a continuous process, not a ‘talking about’ but a living thing, so that in a most extraordinary and exciting way one receives through the aesthetic sense an impression of pure potency.
—Geoffrey Moore, "Wallace Stevens: A Hero of Our Time," The Achievement of Wallace Stevens (J. B. Lippincott & Co., 1962), edited by Ashley Brown and Robert S. Haller.
Showing posts with label creation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label creation. Show all posts
entity of direct appeal
Let me interpose here this axiom of criticism: by explaining the nature of a work of art, we do not explain it away. It is an entity of direct appeal; we do not, in the process of appreciation…unfold the process of creation.
—Herbert Read, Form in Modern Poetry (Sheed & Ward, 1933)
—Herbert Read, Form in Modern Poetry (Sheed & Ward, 1933)
Labels:
appreciation,
art is,
creation,
criticism,
explain,
Herbert Read,
poem is
empire of chimeras
Horace was not one of these who believe that the caprice of the poet suffers no law above itself. In modern times, Young sounded the tocsin of Pseudo-Romanticism, when he declared that “in the fairy-land of fancy genius may wander wild; there it has a creative power, and may reign arbitrarily over its own empire of chimeras.” The poet, indeed, can create a world of his own, and, if he is endowed with the true genius of the poet, can insure our belief in his creation. But, even the poet must not offend our sense of congruity by endeavouring to unite things that are essentially incompatible. Horace would have no sympathy with the false Romanticism which could bring into being a world of chimeras having no conceivable relation with existing experience. Such things he would regard as the fevered dreams of a diseased imagination. He would thus look askance at the riot of imagination, and the unfettered play of emotion, which many regard as the divine prerogative of poets.
…
In a later passage of the Ars Poetica, he seems to go still further, when he insists that the poet’s fictions be “proxima veris.”
—J. F. D’Alton, Roman Literary Theory & Criticism (Russell & Russell, 1962)
…
In a later passage of the Ars Poetica, he seems to go still further, when he insists that the poet’s fictions be “proxima veris.”
—J. F. D’Alton, Roman Literary Theory & Criticism (Russell & Russell, 1962)
small and large
The briefest poem may contain a sort of philosophic scheme of the entire creation.
—Josiah Royce (American philosopher, 1855 - 1916)
—Josiah Royce (American philosopher, 1855 - 1916)
Labels:
brief poem,
creation,
Josiah Royce,
multum in parvo,
philosophy,
scheme
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
